Announcements
Communication Challenges – Cognitive Bias
Communication Challenges - Cognitive Bias
Lab managers communicate regularly with several functional groups within their organization. To a large extent the focus of our work is to provide data that help these folks make well-informed decisions to achieve their goals.
We all know that successful communication should be tuned to the perspective of the audience. In addition to these preferences we need to understand the biases inherent in how people think and process information – These cognitive biases are essentially mental shortcuts that help people make decisions faster. Not necessarily better, but faster.
Cognitive bias can distort the decisions because they color the way data is perceived and evaluated. I often run into ANCHORING. This bias gives extra weight to the first information we are presented with. It seems that any later information to the contrary needs to have extra support to displace this initial idea.
I was recently in the market for a new analytical balance. My first quick internet search for “analytical balance” turned up a unit that lists for $2,000. Subsequent review of different models that actually meet our needed performance standards run about $4,000. While the cheaper scale was not up to the job, all the other models seemed expensive. Interestingly, an assistant who initially identified the more expensive models immediately questioned the $2,000 model and wondered what was wrong with it because it cost so little.
It is important to keep this tendency in mind during negotiations, as the first value discussed can alter the perceived value of the deal. Salespeople may initially propose an inflated price – and then offer discounts that make the final offer a much better deal.
Anchoring can also be significant issue in problem solving. The first possible cause discussed can dominate the focus of efforts and detract from identifying the true root-cause. A firm I was working with had a significant quality failure. It was immediately noted that one feedstock was slightly out of specification. Without further investigation the supplier was contacted; and operations, purchasing, and quality personnel on both sides were quickly involved. Ongoing lab-work revealed that the actual cause of failure originated from variations of a non-specified parameter in a different feedstock. The true cause would have been uncovered much sooner if less weight had been given the initial finding.
How can you address anchoring bias?
- Be aware. If you know it could be at work, you can be on guard.
- Make a conscious effort to evaluate using all information.
- Develop consistent methods of evaluating information.
By Barry Fanning, Ph.D., Senior Scientist, The Andersons, ALMA Board Member
ALMA Welcomes BIMOS: Lab Seating as New Gold Sponsor
ALMA Welcomes BIMOS: LAB SEATING as NEW GOLD SPONSOR
BIMOS: SEATING ENHANCES OVERALL LAB PERFORMANCE
Build Your Leadership Foundation
Build Your Leadership Foundation
When we think of leadership we think of having vision, providing direction and goals, motivating, and having influence. Leadership does not come from having a title or position on the organization chart. A leader is powerless without one essential thing: people. A leader is only truly effective if people want to be led by him or her. For people to want to follow you must start by building a leadership foundation consisting of trust, approachability, and a willingness to learn.
Build trust
- Be as open and transparent as possible.
- Be authentic.
- Admit if you are wrong or don’t know.
- Show interest in people and what they are doing.
- Be fair and consistent.
- Develop a track record.
- Be willing to ask for help
Be approachable
- Approachability starts with trust.
- Show that you value people. Treat them as people not just assets and remember their names.
- Give them your undivided attention. Close the laptop when they are in your office.
- If you can’t give them your undivided attention schedule a time when you can.
- Don’t quickly discount their ideas or concerns. Listen more than you talk.
- Your approachability will impact the engagement and performance of your team.
- Get to know them as people. Ask questions out of curiosity about their lives outside the lab.
Show you are willing to learn
- Accept and admit that you don’t know everything.
- Accept feedback and criticism to improve yourself.
- Ask questions to show you are eager to learn.
- Be open to their ideas.
- Try to learn something from everyone.
- When someone on your team has a skill that they are stronger at than you, allow them independence and a chance to lead that part of a project or job.
Building your leadership foundation is a key step in becoming the leader people want to follow.
Based on excerpts from John Maxwell Company Leadership podcast #56 and edited by John Sadowski, ALMA Executive Director
ALMA Welcomes Kalleid as a New Gold Sponsor
ALMA Welcomes Kalleid as New Gold Sponsor
Afraid of Giving Feedback? Tips for Speaking Constructively at Work
Afraid of Giving Feedback? Tips for Speaking Constructively at Work
As leaders in the workplace, how often do we buffer our employees from feedback? How often do we find ourselves holding back valid and useful information and giving messages that are diluted at best?
For most leaders, the response is: too often to count.
That’s because honest feedback is difficult -- even painful -- to give and to receive. It’s so much easier to shirk these uncomfortable situations by just avoiding them. Yet this takes a toll on productivity.
This dynamic shows up in organizations of all shapes and sizes, and I’ve boiled it down to a
three-prong paradigm -- one I like to call the“Feedback Trifecta”.
In the Feedback Trifecta, the skills needed to give feedback are underdeveloped, leaders responsible for delivering the feedback lack the courage to do it, and the typical workplace environment unknowingly and sometimes knowingly promotes avoiding honest and open communication. And organizations pay for it since avoidance merely causes problems to fester and resentment to grow. Teams and entire companies can become feedback-resistant, and will inevitably suffer.
But it doesn’t have to be like this. As leaders, we can take control of our feedback situation and make it work for us. Listed below are a few tips I offer to workplace leaders for giving consistent, on-point feedback:
Minimize the Threat We Represent. Giving feedback that inspires courage and moves others to action (not reaction), requires minimizing the threat we represent. As the feedback giver, we are not outside the process but within the process. And when you’re inside the process of receiving feedback, you are vulnerable. This means that the feedback giver should mirror the
receiver’s vulnerability. One way to do this is to start the feedback process by sharing the intention behind what you are sharing and setting a non-threatening but supportive tone for the conversation.
Show Empathy. True empathy is about feeling with someone and acknowledging how the other person is feeling. When we do this, we allow the emotion to surface and find its appropriate place in the conversation. If we ignore the emotion or pretend it’s not there, we become even more of a threat to the person we’re speaking with.
Use Exploratory Language versus Absolutes. The language we use when providing feedback can be critical to the outcome. Using absolutes such as always, never, none, and can’t, or imperatives such as must and should back our receiver into a corner and make them feel judged and defensive. Instead, try using exploratory language, which demonstrates a
willingness to be open. Exploratory language includes phrases like “I’m wondering if,” “Have you considered,” “I’d like to share some thoughts I have”, “Can I explore this with you further?” When we are using exploratory language, we are inviting the other person to consider our perspective as a perspective, not as an absolute. In doing so, we minimize the threat our words represent.
Demonstrate Compassionate Persistence. Compassionate persistence requires staying true to the message regardless of the pushback the giver might receive from the receiver of the feedback. It also means not allowing the message to be derailed, deflected, or diluted. This can be extremely tough sometimes when others don’t want to hear feedback. We are tempted to
change our message so others can hear it rather than changing how we deliver it so that others can hear it.
The tough consequence of giving feedback is that we can’t control how the other person will hear our words. Nor can we decide what they will choose to do with these words. Feedback may very well cause the people we care about and work with to avoid us, hold grudges, and lash out at us. If they choose to be the victim, we become the villain. This is why giving feedback takes courage. The choice we have is to shy away from it -- or give it skillfully and courageously, thus driving real, constructive results.